The 2x2 matrix isn’t new - but most data teams still score “value” completely wrong.
Value to the business on one axis. Effort on the other. Simple framework. The problem isn’t the framework - it’s how teams fill it in.
Most data teams score “value” as technical elegance. How interesting the problem is. How much they’d enjoy building it. That’s not value. That’s preference.
Value means measurable business impact. “This cuts manual reporting time by 40%.” “This reduces churn by 15% per quarter.” If you can’t put a number on it, it’s not high-value - it’s a pet project.
I ran this exercise at a client last year. Their top-priority initiative was rebuilding the entire ingestion layer in a new framework. When I asked what business outcome it served, the room went quiet. They’d scored it high because the current setup was “ugly.” Not because it was failing.
The fix: force every initiative through one question. “What business metric does this move?” No answer, no priority. Pair each one with a named business sponsor. No sponsor means nobody actually cares enough.
How does your data team currently decide what to build next?