Every AI initiative is an architecture stress test.

92% of CIOs plan to implement AI in 2026, or was it 100% 🤔 . That’s 92% about to stress-test their architecture.

Good data pipelines become great with AI. Poor data quality becomes confidently wrong at scale. Clean integrations enable intelligent automation. Spaghetti integrations create intelligent chaos.

I’ve watched organizations pour millions into AI initiatives only to discover their real problem wasn’t the model, it was the foundation underneath it.

The pattern is predictable:

Phase 1: “AI will change everything” Phase 2: “Why can’t we get clean data to the model?” Phase 3: “We need to fix our data architecture first.” Phase 4: The AI initiative becomes an architecture remediation project

The companies succeeding with AI in 2026 aren’t the ones with the best models. They’re the ones who invested in architecture before the AI gold rush. They have data that flows. Systems that integrate. Foundations that can actually support what they’re building on top.

AI doesn’t solve architectural problems. It reveals them-expensively and publicly.

Before your next AI initiative, ask: will your architecture pass the stress test?